« Product Debut - The I-Rack | Main | Losing Palestine to al-Qaeda »

Global Peace Index Finds Israel Lagging Behind the Pack

Global Peace IndexA new Global Peace Index has just been launched, developed by the uber-credible Economist Intelligence Unit and an international panel of peace institute and think tank experts, with a star-studded list of endorsing individuals and organizations.  They rank 121 countries with Norway claiming pole position, and Israel coming in at... 119th.  Chapeau to my homeland for finishing ahead of Sudan and Iraq!

Top place Middle Eastern spot goes to Oman at number 22, while the USA comes in at 96, squeezing Iran into the 97th slot, and Russia ranks one above Israel at 118.  The indicators for compiling this Global peace index are actually quite fascinating, and you can read them here.  24 indicators were used, and their site gives the source and methodology applied.  They include: wars, deaths from internal and external conflict, human rights, political instability, size of security forces and jailed population, military expenditure and sales, and involvement in peacekeeping operations.  This strikes me as something not to be poo-pooed, but rather to be taken seriously.

Of course many in the so-called "pro-Israel community" will do their best to ignore the index, dismiss it as biased, villify those behind it, or perhaps even a combination of the above.  Then there will be the predictable, and so overworn appeal that "what Israel needs is better PR" (we have a special word for it -- hasbarah).  Some effective fundraising might even be done off the back of this.  That would be the business-as-usual response that has failed and is wrong.  It would once again address the symptom rather than the cause, and do absolutely nothing positive or helpful for Israel.  Israel's security (not to mention that of the Palestinians or the region) has not been advanced by business as usual.  Israel last year had the lowest immigration (aliyah) numbers in almost 20 years, and an increasing number of Israelis of European background are taking out a second passport, just in case.  This is also hardly an Israel that can be attractive, enthusing, andTanks inspiring to world Jewry, or that can be an anchor in fostering Jewish identity and values.

I hope this doesn't sound too trite, but the one thing that Israel and the people who care about Israel should do to radically improve the country's ranking in advance of next year's index would be to promote an end to the occupation, agreed permanent borders with all the neighbors, and a positive response to the Arab League Initiative.

Watch out, Russia, Israel might overtake you.


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (3)

Arthur Obermayer:

Your article "What Next on Palestine: Time to Get Real" of June 15 is quite appropriate and makes many valid points. However, although there is a new reality on the ground with Hamas in control of Gaza, many of us have been calling for Western nations to negotiate with Hamas, regardless of their current position on acceptance of Israel and renunciation of terrorism. Hamas is in a very poor position to negotiate with Israel, and the only "give-ups" of value to Israel in a negotiation are those things Israel wants them to give up as a pre-condition to negotiation. Israel should make it clear that these give-ups are essential to a final agreement, but it is unrealistic to impose them as a pre-condition.

Although I agree with your article, it is unlikely to have much impact because the current separation of West Bank and Gaza governments makes it easier for the Western nations to actively pursue their existing policies.


Why does Israel need to change its "peace index"?

It is what it is.

Israel is surrounded by unusually hostile and aggressive neighbors.

Israel is at war: obviously it doesnt have a great peace ranking!

Norway had a crappy peace index too, when the Nazis invaded it, precisely because Norway didnt have a strong military. Life for Norway's Homefront was bitterly lacking peace.

PS, life in the US is great! The most peaceful country Ive ever lived in! Life in the US is peaceful BECAUSE its military crushes the enemy.


In other words, Mr. Levy believes that appeasement is the solution to the problem. Israel withdrew from Gaza and the result is a rain of kassems falling on Sderot. What makes Mr. Levy believe that withdrawal from the West Bank will result in a stoppage of these attacks? The answer is that a unilateral withdrawel will only result in a rain of kassems fired from the West Bank. One wonders what it will take for well meaning individuals like Mr. Levy to finally understand that the Palestinians don't want a 2 state solution. They want a 1 state solution with the current State of Israel going out of business.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Daniel Levy


Powered by
Movable Type 3.33


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 31, 2007 12:00 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Product Debut - The I-Rack.

The next post in this blog is Losing Palestine to al-Qaeda.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.