« Five Comments on the Lebanon Situation | Main | Right Wing Media Skew Poll on American Muslim Attitudes »

Jon Stewart Gets Serious About the Middle East

Last night's Daily Show on Comedy Central was dominated by the Middle East, and much of it was serious stuff - in stark contrast to what passes as "real news coverage."  In the show's central  interview Jon Stewart asked Zaki Chehab (whose new book "Inside Hamas" we posted about last month) what America should do, clarifying that, by 'we,' he meant the President, as most of the public was too busy watching American Idol. Chehab seemed nervous, but got his main point across - that the American failure to back moderates in the region with efforts at serious political problem solving gave a constant boost to radical al Qaedist groups.  

Chehab detailed that strengthening moderates needed to mean more than just visits to the region, warm embraces, and involvement to get, for instance, "tomato trucks out of gaza on time," but had to extend to "imposing a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."  While I'm skeptical that an American-imposed solution is either realistic or desirable, there would be real value if America made resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict a national priority, and, acting accordingly, presented its own detailed parameters for what a permanent status agreement should look like. 

Perhaps more interesting than the interviewee were the rather leading "questions" being posed to him by Jon Stewart that seemed to more than hint at the hosts own understanding of the issue -  Stewart really seems to get it

If we used the resources and strength we have used in Iraq in the Palestinian territories [the implication is to make peace -DL] would we have been successful?


Would it take the steam out of the conflict with Islam if that [the Israeli-Palestinian conflict] gets solved?

The other segment of the show was about Lebanon.  It was far more amusing, albeit inaccurate at times.  For a good laugh click here.  For a better idea about what is going on in Northern Lebanon, see the post below.



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments (2)


While I too am doubtful of the effectivenss of an American-imposed solution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, I could not agree more with Chehab's assessment that US needs to make real efforts in the region to strengthen the moderates, beyond the transport of tomatoes, and with your assessment that the US needs to take an active political role in an Israeli-Palestinian peace process.

Jon Stewart Fan:

I am a huge fan of Mr. Setwart, however, is recent interview with Zaki Chehab was one of his worst. While I agree that he has a nuanced understading of the region, he obviously didn't read Zaki's book. If he had he would have asked far more interesting questions. And his bit on Lebanon was just plain wrong. To say that America has nothing to do with the internal conflict in Lebanon is "fake" journalism at its worst. HAHA.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Daniel Levy


Powered by
Movable Type 3.33


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 22, 2007 5:39 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Five Comments on the Lebanon Situation.

The next post in this blog is Right Wing Media Skew Poll on American Muslim Attitudes.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.